Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th May 2008 21:00 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Ever since I started using computers, I've been baffled by the relative clumsiness of installing applications. Whether we are talking the really old days (launching the Rambo game off a tape), the '90s (running Keen or using installers in Windows 95), or the modern days (still those installers, but now also package management and self-contained applications); it's all relatively cumbersome, and they all have their downsides. I decided to put my money where my mouth is, and come up with my idealistic, utopian method of installing, running, updating, and uninstalling applications.
Permalink for comment 313123
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: GoboLinux
by TemporalBeing on Tue 6th May 2008 17:11 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: GoboLinux"
TemporalBeing
Member since:
2007-08-22

Well, I meant that the LSB project tries to stablish a core system (including specific libraries), so that third party application packages can just depend on lsb-core. For instance, take this section:

http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB...

"Packages shall have a dependency that indicates which LSB modules are required. [...] Packages shall not depend on other system-provided dependencies. They shall not depend on non-system-provided dependencies unless the package provider also makes available the LSB conforming packages needed to satisfy such dependencies. "


Yes, LSB tries to establish a core. And most of it is okay, but it still doesn't go quite far enough. Personally, I think they need to get RPM out of LSB and replace it with something like (though not necessarily) Autopackage. It would make the LSB a far better standard, and would really help towards Linux on the Desktop too.

Reply Parent Score: 1