Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th May 2008 15:15 UTC, submitted by Shlomi Fish
Permalink for comment 313138
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
Nor does not having source code available mean that the program is not high quality either. IMHO, this article has a strong open source bias, and should be renamed to: "What Makes Open Source Software High-Quality?'
I was just thinking about this as I'm skimming through the article. It is very heavily open-source biased. And there are things that are just rather stupid, IMHO. Like for example, an average user does not need access to the sources nor will she care about them, average user won't be compiling the stuff and so on. So, is it almost like the author is talking about what is high-quality open-source software with a developer in mind, not from general usability point from the end-user point of view.
So, my list of things in his list that DO NOT make software high-quality:
* The Source is Available, Preferably under a Usable Licence: - this is useful only for developers, and it doesn't mean the software is any good.
* The Software is Easy to Compile, Deploy and Install: - Look above. I've installed both pretty poor apps and pretty good apps both with exactly the same routine "./configure && make && make install". And this is again only useful for packagers or developers.
* The Software Has Packages for Most Common Distributions: - This has nothing to do with the quality of the software rather than the distributions packagers bothering to include the software. This point also assumes you are using an OS which comes in multiple distributions.