Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th May 2008 09:02 UTC
Back in November of 2006, I wrote a piece about the One Laptop Per Child Project. I was afraid that the project's focus on creating a whole new paradigm (the Sugar UI) would ultimately intervene with the actual goal of the project: teaching stuff to kids. Ivan Krstic, former director of security architecture at OLPC, wrote an essay in which he heavily criticises the OLPC project.
Permalink for comment 314159
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2006-01-16
"Keeping people learning one single platform, why don't take OS X for instance? Is much clean and not desktop lock in..."
Except that it _is_ a desktop lock in, just as Windows. Thinking about that, you could also call Gnome a desktop lock in.
Sugar has the advantage that it doesn't teach any desktop. It's a dedicated platform as a learning environment.