Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th May 2008 17:59 UTC, submitted by TLZ_
Permalink for comment 314454
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-24
I've been wondering about when GTK+ will up its own ante and adopt similar features to what QT4 is boasting, especially http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/02/19/qt-styling-add... .
No doubt that this is lending a hand to GTK+ users, but I think that this is more of a failure of the GTK+ camp to suck it up and improve the toolkit to bring it to the par of Qt4. It's like the GTK+ developers have more of a "bleh, let's wait until it looks *really* out of date in comparison to other widget toolkits!"
Or is it because the GNOME collective's leaders are wild about using XUL and the Mozilla platform as a future mainstay for GNOME development, and aren't really focusing on enhancement of GTK+?
/I use Windows, and I'm not a fan of either toolkit or desktop environment.
/web design student, so of course I think Qt styling is an awesome concept.
Edited 2008-05-16 06:30 UTC