Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jun 2008 22:00 UTC, submitted by capnix
Permalink for comment 318100
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-15
In the day where there are corporate dollars helping developers focus on developing why has X fallen so far behind on it's goals?
)
Is there too much focus on the end result (ie, compiz, plasma) rather than the the basis of the entire visual experience? I for one would much rather put my money into X than into wobbly windows. (as fun as that it.
Leaving bugs unsolved and dropping features doesn't sound like a great way to improve the standing of open source software.