Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jun 2008 17:12 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Permalink for comment 318151
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-30
"Greener computing" are the hot words on the IT media, but the concept is not in the CIO's head. The only exception I can remember is Google and even then is not about saving energy, is about using alternative energy sources.
As far as I can tell, only small companies care about saving energy on servers because they pay the bill. When the servers are hosted on datacenters, things goes like "it's not my business" and I can't remember a single Datacenter saying things like "hey, we'll cause 'little' performance impact on your servers to save energy, is that OK?". No customer would agree to that.
Greener computing on server systems does not sound the right thing to be concerned. Putting OSes side-by-side is like asking to create another useless flamewar.
"... and the next article in the series is 'Achieving server performance on laptops.'"
...