Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jun 2008 17:12 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Green, power reduction, and climate change are all the rage these days, and the world of computers is not off the hook on this one. Software and hardware manufacturers are trying hard to keep power consumption down - while first something for mostly mobile computers, desktops and servers are now part of the effort too. PC World tested Windows Server 2008 and two Linux server offerings and compared their power usage patterns.
Permalink for comment 318182
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2008-06-03
@ jabbotts
Sorry mate,
As of 2 days ago, my main laptop is Linux only. I reinstalled Ubuntu over the whole drive.
The second one is actually a dual-boot Vector Linux and WinXP sp2 box (forgot to mention it, sorry) and Vector manages to get about 20 minutes more out of it. It's an old laptop though and I've never done battery calibration on it.... and Vector is a very lightweight distro to begin with.... so it's probably not a fair comparison.
Doubt I'll be getting sp3 though. I don't need Windows for anything now. I use a Mac Pro for my job and will probably use open source software hereon for other stuff. (the only reason I continued relying on Windows was because the codec pack I needed to watch my hi-def Japanese anime was windows only and VLC for Mac wasn't cutting it, but that was before I discovered the awesome MPlayer for Linux)
Cheers.
Edited 2008-06-11 16:19 UTC