Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 15th Jun 2008 20:47 UTC, submitted by eMalware
Permalink for comment 318673
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-15
Nobody really stated that it's a difference of the quality of hardware, its the packaging and design. Yes you can run OS X on vanilla hardware but saying you don't have to hack anything to get it to run is a ignorant insult to the people who spent hours coding the workarounds so that you can just download a patch and burn a DVD. Yeah maybe afterwords all you have to do is hack some device ID's in a PLIST to get the hardware working, but way more work that you didn't do went into it.
Apple selects hardware, programs/picks the drivers, and bundles them with their software. All the setups are stress tested to make sure they work. You can do the same with vanilla hardware and stress test the crap out of it so you know if works 100% but you won't know that it still will when the next release comes out and no you still don't have an Apple computer even if the hardware is the same grade or better.