Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jun 2008 09:17 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Permalink for comment 318812
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-09-06
"
Microsoft software wasn't always the best, yet he managed to sell better than his rivals
"
This is where most of us technically literate end users take the biggest issue. Better technology loosing out to better marketing does not benefit the end user like it benefits the share holder.
He has done some great things and the IT world would have been a different place without MS. His corporate monster has also done some real duzies towards the end users.
He was always a strategy and business genious that happened to be good with computers though rather the reverse.
On the up side, if all he does is walk around throwing money at problems; he has enough to make a noticable difference as a philanthropist. If he focuses that strategic mind on philanthropic challenges rather than business challenges; he stand to make a huge difference. It will be interesting to watch what happens after "the departure" (dunt.. dunt.. daa) though and see what the foundation can really do. You have to give credit where due.