Linked by Adam S on Wed 18th Jun 2008 14:40 UTC
Microsoft The launch of Microsoft's new interoperability principles have been both cautiously welcomed and sceptically scrutinised as the company goes about convincing the IT industry that it is genuine in its pursuit to provide interoperability with rival products, more consumer choice, less vendor lock-in and greater collaboration with the open source community. Here, Microsoft Australia CTO Greg Stones gives some obviously polished PR-approved responses to questions from Computerworld regarding the motivations behind support for ODF and PDF, what the software giant is really gaining by providing support to rival formats, and the ambiguities in its Open Specification Promise. He also gives a painfully polished response to CNN's senior editor's claims that the company is trying to eliminate free software.Typical Microsoft PR response to tough questions, but interesting nonetheless....
Permalink for comment 318955
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
yeah right
by raver31 on Wed 18th Jun 2008 15:34 UTC
raver31
Member since:
2005-07-06

I tried to open the first link on the article.... http://www.microsoft.com/interop/principles/default.mspx

using Firefox3. A stock Firefox3, no alterations have been made to the codepages or the fonts, and this Microsoft page was totally unreadable. Well, not totally, but the fonts were too small and ill-defined. In fact, plain ugly. So much so that I closed the page

Of course, I could have messed around with my fonts so that I might end up with something that wont destroy my eyes, but then the onus is on me to go out of my way....

If Microsoft are being truthful about being interoperable, should they not put their money where their mouth is and display a site that we can ALL look at !

Edited 2008-06-18 15:36 UTC