Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jun 2008 21:09 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Permalink for comment 319273
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-15
This sounds kind of cool. I can imagine a variety of angles:
... Of course, it's probably a combination of some of the above and a million things I'd never even consider ;-) I think MS looked pretty slimy with the ISO standards process so I'm glad to see them backing down on OOXML.
1. Microsoft is doing this because they want to provide a useful, open standard and it's the right thing to do.
2. This might make the EU look at MS in a better light.
3. MS believes that Office software is opening up, and they have no choice but to do it or their product will be worthless some day.
4. As long as they use another format by default, they don't actually care too much. Maybe they don't plan on putting much effort in to supporting the format correctly anyway.
Some are *ahem* more likely than others