Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Jun 2008 12:07 UTC
A constant thorn in the eye of many Linux kernel developers is the existence of closed-source kernel modules, most notably those by Nvidia and Ati, but also some file system drivers and other elements. Most of the Linux developers have been against these modules ever since they were first used, and in fact, bug reports originating from a tainted kernel are often disregarded and ignored. The kernel developers have now rallied together by issuing a statement urging vendors to release open source Linux kernel modules and drivers.
Permalink for comment 319769
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2005-07-06
How about the people doing the nouvea driver?
And you seem to be missing the point, if we have the source and nvidia drops support for a card or moves support to legacy e.g. no new features even if the hardware could support it, n theory another one could take up the job for maintaining the driver. Without the source code, no one could take up that job.
You claim to be a fair person, okay maybe you can answer me this:
How is it fair that a customer have to change his working hardware, because the vendor has dropped driver support?
This is not just nvidia, they do a good job on their driver by keeping hardware support for old hardware alive in legacy.
I didn't find it fair when I discovered that my soundcard (SB Live Digtal or something) couldn't be installered on WinXP after SP2. The hardware worked fine, creative's driver policy sucked. If I wasn't a major geek I would have had to buy a new card.