Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jun 2008 09:49 UTC
Permalink for comment 319968
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
People are asking the wrong thing of Nvidia, their source is their own.. AMD isn't releasing their drivers source, what everyone should have been asking is for the release of DOCUMENTATION. (But no, Linux developers are lame code seeking monkeys..)
Oh no, far from it.
For example ... AMD/ATI didn't release open source code ... instead they released hardware documentation.
http://developer.amd.com/documentation/Pages/default.aspx
There is an AMD/ATI driver fro Linux called fglrx, but that is closed source. There are now not one but at least two open-source drivers for AMD/ATI graphics cards ...
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_evolution&nu...
Intel release source code of an open source for their cards, but recently Intel have released documentation as well.
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/documentation.html
Edited 2008-06-25 13:44 UTC