Linked by David Adams on Fri 27th Jun 2008 05:10 UTC, submitted by Ager Ignis
Permalink for comment 320428
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-01-01
You are right. Especially this is suspicious when you know that Vista's kernel is doing things that should make the performance better:
- it does not waste unused process time slices (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc162494.aspx)
- it has I/O prioritized, so you can run things like windows defender in low priority I/O so it doesn't monopolize
- I think it has also memory access priorities
- cancallabe I/O
But maybe these things are consumed by things like: windows defender, sidebar, visual fx, leaky gadgets.
Maybe not, because if you turn those off, you still have feel slow.
I think we should have detective Monk and Columbo on this case ;-)