Linked by David Adams on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 16:11 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
KDE "After the recent release KDE 4.1 beta 2 and openSUSE 11 with KDE 4.0.4, some critics have been especially vocal in expressing their displeasure with the KDE 4 user interface paradigms. The debate has grown increasingly caustic as critics and supporters engage in a war of words over the technology. The controversy has escalated to the point where some users are now advocating a fork in order to move forward the old KDE 3.5 UI paradigms. As an observer who has closely studied each new release of KDE 4, I'm convinced that the fork rhetoric is an absurdly unproductive direction for this debate."
Permalink for comment 321057
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Forks are good
by aseigo on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 19:26 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Forks are good"
aseigo
Member since:
2005-07-06

see what you make it do by trying to build something different from the official desktop with it.


being tired of the one-true-way-of-doing-things in kde3 (e.g. icons on the desktop, "the" k menu, and *always* a panel!) with no recourse other than a complete rewrite of things, i started designing plasma.

so i would love to see what you describe above to happen as it is one of the motivations behind the project: make it easy to make new stuff with no assumptions forced upon you.

this is why there are something like 6 different application launchers (aka "application menus") in development in different places. diversify, experiment, realize that confining people to one way of doing things is Bad(tm) (even though you need to provide a default experience).

it seemed quite in line with the ideas of freedom otherwise embodied in our software.

Edited 2008-07-02 19:26 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 13