Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 5th Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 321683
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-15
That's an absurd comment to make. Distro maintainers are supposed to be smart and have their own quality assurance for their distribution before releasing software.
If you want software on the bleeding edge, there's no sense in complaining. If you don't, then maybe you should consider reading a review or two before you jump in. Discussing the version number is stupid. All software is always in development, the only thing that matters is whether it provides the functionality you need (or, in the case of upgrades, improves your situation).
I think the Linux desktop environments need a ton of work, and I'm absolutely happy that KDE devs decided to try something new out. And, yeah, I think that they should spend their time doing what benefits them, whether it's enjoyable programming, progressing the goals of the company that employs them, or making a desktop they like to use.