Linked by Adam S on Fri 11th Jul 2008 04:37 UTC, submitted by peskypescado
Permalink for comment 322553
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-25
Then it's open.
The Specification IS open (at least mostly):
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf/pdf/swf_file_format_spec_v9.pdf
There is still some important bits missing - the big ones being RTMP and the spark codec stuff - but whats there has been open since May. But to be clear, its not open source - but it is an open spec.
Implement a player yourself. Then you can compile it, put it on a CD and sell it. If that is your definition of open then its open. You just have to do the hard part - implementation. They don't provide an open source reference implementation.
Now having said that - I still think Flash sucks and the way forward is through text based vectoring formats (SVG, canvas, etc.). Standardization of audio/video media codecs and graphics/vector libraries should be developed independently imho.