Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Fri 11th Jul 2008 15:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 322621
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-09
I don't think that any single person needs to replace every single feature in Photoshop. But I agree that there are many features in PS that doesn't exist in the alternatives.
However, if the user doesn't need those features then why can't gimp or pixel be direct replacements?
I found it odd that they tried to list alternatives to Fireworks though since there really aren't any alternatives to that one, not even on Win or Mac.