Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 16th Jul 2008 22:30 UTC, submitted by computerishcat
Permalink for comment 323273
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-07
GNOME would consider Qt if Nokia donated Qt to GNOME foundation and re-licensed it LGPL, but it will not replace GTK+. Qt would be just like XUL, SWT or any other GUI toolkit that feels (and works) naturally on GNOME desktop... maybe as accepted dependency on GNOME platform!
I don't know why people keep forgetting something very important: GNOME is not just a user of GTK+, GNOME owns GTK+ (technically wrong but practically correct). Those guys would take GTK+ wherever they feel like doing so for the benefit of the GNOME project. [This is something very important] KDE, the biggest user of Qt, are lucky to get if for free, but they have no control over the direction of Qt, they are under the mercy of Nokia's business strategy. Why would GNOME get itself in such a trap?