Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Fri 18th Jul 2008 17:06 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Permalink for comment 323623
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-03-20
There is too much confusion about information security - often technology or product led. Just because you can do firewalling doesn't mean you should. Just because you can do user account control doesn't mean its the end of the story.
To analsyse an information system with respect to security, look at it from the perspective of the following four orthogonal views:
* Confidentiality / Privacy
Information should only be viewable by those authorised to do so. Is this maintained in the system I am looking at? (linux: init 1?)
* Integrity
The integrity of informations should be maintained and verifiable. This includes both the source of the information - source integrity, as well as the message itself in transit - message integrity. Not many system maintain do this sufficiently for the purposes of their jobs. Also think, spam and phishing!
* Availability
A system or service should aim to maintain availability or quality of service appropriate to its intended purpose. An attacker may not seek to read your messages or subvert them - just slow them down to an unusable crawl, or even knock your system out. Many see this as Denial Of Service.
* Auditability
Who did What, When and Why?
The above perspectives can be applied to large complex systems or small individual components.