Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Jul 2008 22:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 324447
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-13
I think one of the major issues that Vista has is that too many OEMs are shipping it out on computers loaded with a lot of crapware and outdated drivers. If you fix that, you have a much more usable system:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=429
Seriously, OEMs might make a little on the crapware, but they're seriously shooting themselves in the foot and steering customers to Macs.
The second problem is the reviews. I've read several reviews where they would install Vista over a copy of XP that had a 3yo version of Norton-something on it. Forget it, you just killed the machine. Upgrading Windows=ALWAYS clean install. I don't fault the reviewers for doing it this way... I mean, that's probably how most end users would do it. But still, I've never known any version of Windows to do particularly well when upgraded over an older copy.
If you start out with fairly modern hardware with compatable Vista drivers and a clean install, things won't be perfect, but they'll be much improved.