Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Mon 28th Jul 2008 18:42 UTC, submitted by Dan Warne
Permalink for comment 324820
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
There was only the one comment when I popped this article. You beat me too the second by the time I read the article and swapped back but I was thinking the same thing:
MS counts a Vista license as a Vista sale even though they allow Vista licenses to be used against XP installs??!! Next they'll tell us that MS counts any license going from there warehouse to a reseller's warehouse as a sale even if that license is not yet purchases by an end user. Say it isn't so!! Oh the humanity!! Who will think of the children.. oooh.. won't someone think of the children!?
I kind of thought there was going to be something new in the article though too rather than just a major vendor like HP stating exactly what everyone else has been stating since the first release of MS sales figures for Vista.
This is why "figures" will continue to be complete bunk until the counts for OS activations and updates can be reviewed. I can't think of figures that would be more accurate for measuring actual end user installs rather than business to business resales. MS knows what those figures are but they obviously don't match the marking or they would have been paraded prominently already.
Edited 2008-07-28 19:44 UTC