Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Mon 28th Jul 2008 18:42 UTC, submitted by Dan Warne
Permalink for comment 324930
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-20
Today people have gotten more pragmatic about the OS. We will develop for XP and try to use the standards Windows API as much as possible and chances are it will work fine in Windows 95 - Vista. But test in XP as that is what most people are running.
*EXACTLY*
Win32 is not perfect, but you can create any application in it. Why should you narrow your user base by using some shiny new incompatible API?
Heck, even today I am still forced to support some customers running Win98... As developer, I see no benefits in new "silverbullet" API that is supposed to "save windows".