
There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones
earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to
take legal action against PsyStar,
claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will
stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have
hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Member since:
2006-09-18
it's more like buying DRM'd music from iTunes, then cracking the DRM (which also breaks EULA/DCMA), then put the .mp3 on a usb drive and delete it from your iTunes, so that the .mp3 on the usb drive is the only copy. Then sell that, not personally.... but as a business.
Maybe in the process (of breaking the DRM)jacking up the id3 tags, which then people think "gosh this came from iTunes before it was cracked, so iTunes must suck at tagging their music?) and damaging thier name? But that's ok because "WE_SELL_xTUNES_ON_USB_DRIVES.COM" will re-update your broken id3 tags by grabbing them from Apple, making them compatible(ish) with the brokenDRM'd version of your mp3's, then updating them.
or something