
There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones
earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to
take legal action against PsyStar,
claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will
stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have
hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Member since:
2005-07-03
I want Apple to win. Here're my reasons:
I am an Apple user. I am happy with all the Macs I've had in the past. When I switched 5 years ago, I was very happy. I enjoyed computers again. After more than 13 years of Windows/DOS, OS/2 and Linux, I found a nice computer to get stuff done.
I don't care to "pay more" for the "same hardware" that you can get at www.buyclonesandmakethemyourself.com, as much as I don't care for Free Software. The world has way more problems than "free" software. The economy is based upon a business model that drives companies to earn money. I don't care about how much "free" my Operating System is, as much as I don't care for the TV Firmware.
This is not a 100% free world, it never will and you gotta live with it. I don't understand the Free/Open advocates. I can understand the values of Open Source, and free (as in beer) stuff, but I also understand the other side of the coin. OS X belongs to Apple Inc. You don't "buy" OS X, you buy a license to use it. They decide to put the terms how / where to use it. If you don't like it, don't buy it. What's so hard to understand?
If I just forget about Apple, OSX, computers, etc., I just go beyond this and try to find an analogy, and it seems so natural.
They programmed OS X, they do what they want if you want to use it.
It's just another point of view. People will disagree with this. Before clicking the "-" button, remember: this is just another point of view, as valid as the other one; the one that praises freedom to do whatever you want with the license you paid for. I just use the computer as a tool, as entertainment, etc. I can do whatever I want with my computer. Apple is not using my mouse to move my cursor.
I don't know. Maybe I'm too naive or this people are too closed minded (no pun intended).