
There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones
earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to
take legal action against PsyStar,
claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will
stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have
hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Member since:
2005-11-21
Probably. What is unlawful about that?
There selling this solution to drive hardware sales of their own clone products without an OEM license from Apple to do so; and if they think the responsibility of this software tool will be the responsibility of the hardware purchaser they are completely wrong.
This isn't a reverse engineering case. This is using tools to debug the Apple Installation process and thus write scripts to mimick the Apple certified hardware to allow it to install on their non-licensed hardware which gives them a profit.
This case will end quickly for Psystar.