Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Legal There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to take legal action against PsyStar, claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Permalink for comment 325354
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by netpython on Sat 2nd Aug 2008 09:37 UTC
Member since:

Apple will simply add a disclaimer:"By using OSX you agree with the terms.."

And legally any installed instance with non agreed disclaimer is illegal.

Then again if Apple had a MS marketshare they would at least have a monopoly problem here in Europe.

Nonetheless an interesting case to follow, i'm axious to know what precedent will surface :-)

Reply Score: 2