Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Legal There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to take legal action against PsyStar, claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Permalink for comment 325380
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Interesting
by wriggie on Sat 2nd Aug 2008 22:41 UTC in reply to "Interesting"
wriggie
Member since:
2008-08-02

I think the point of Apple's EULA has a lot to do with consistent quality to the user experience. The relationship between Apple hardware and software is what keeps the overall user base happy and loyal- if OS X were to get licensed to any PC it would also need to be supported by Apple. Not because it's an absolute requirement for an OS maker (Microsoft proves it's possible to sell an OS and not give a damn if it doesn't work with your hardware) but because a bad OS X experience brought about by a generic PC would poison the software groundwater. That's why they don't even support Leopard on some of their own hardware. It'll run below the official requirements sure, but the user experience is compromised.

For Mac users there has been and always will be a cohesiveness to computing. It's a complete experience. Apple isn't perfect, but in most cases they have your back. Microsoft is an engine producer that doesn't know much about how to make cars. Apple understands that if any part of your car is of poor quality it will greatly effect your overall experience. Therefore they make or control everything in their cars.

Also, Apple doesn't want to replace Microsoft. Not by simply letting anyone run with half of their product (the OS is PART of the hardware-software package, not some standalone thing) The market share will grow for Linux and OS X because as computing becomes more complicated, and connected to all manner of equipment, people are going to get sick of Windows just not working. with their phones, or cameras, or whatever else crashes Vista.

The Ferrari engine has no business being wedged into a run-down old Chevy. You might get it to run, but who gets blamed when the Chevy craps out?

Reply Parent Score: 1