
In an "as told to" article for CIO.com, Linus Torvalds
explains how he keeps the Linux people and software on-track. Arguably the most surprising facet of Linus' management style is that he's perfectly willing to flame people when he thinks they're wrong--though he's also happy to be corrected himself. "Part of that, by the way, is not feeling shy about saying impolite things or showing some emotion. So I'd rather flame people for doing stupid things and call them stupid, rather than try to be too polite to the point where people didn't understand how strongly I felt about something." That's particularly interesting in light of several OSCON presenters who believe that the way to grow the open source community is to
make projects more welcoming to would-be contributors. Do these attitudes actually contradict one another?
Member since:
2005-07-28
I have news for you, you can be polite and honest at the same time.
The problem I see is that everyone tries to be as arrogant as Linus, and when more that one arrogant person is in the same discution things get stuck.
I just see the "honestly" thing as a lame excuse to be rude with the others.