Linked by Andrew Youll on Sat 17th Sep 2005 11:22 UTC, submitted by JonasDue
Permalink for comment 32617
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
First of all: Please spell check before commenting, especially since it is a one sentence slam on the article. The least you could do would be to spell correctly. Second of all: I think that those in IT can relate to this article. If we are on-staff IT we have certainly had managers and others want to use some technology without consideration for security. They want features and expect that nothing will go wrong as long as it is behind a Cisco Pix (R). I found the article to be good at demonstrating some of the security issues and the mindset of those in IT.