Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Sat 16th Aug 2008 01:04 UTC, submitted by sharkscott
Permalink for comment 327198
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-05
I disagree with two points here...
Red Hat was and is a part of the community and just happened to become a corporate player as well. IBM and Novell didn't take a risk on this pet project called Linux and make it a success. No, they jumped on board after Linux was already a success. Yes, IBM (and Novell to a lesser degree) have helped improve corporate acceptance of Linux amongst the techo-neophyte manager types who unfortunately make corporate technology decisions, but they are not the reason behind Linux's success.
First, BSD has had a huge impact on the market. Not only is it the base upon which OS X was built, but look at the battle it won against AT&T. That was a huge win for the market.
Second, FreeBSD is an incredible project. I wouldn't regard it less simply because it doesn't have as strong a corporate following as Linux seems to have.