Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Aug 2008 15:37 UTC
Editorial Earlier this week, we ran a story on GoboLinux, and the distribution's effort to replace the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard with a more pleasant, human-readable, and logical design. A lot of people liked the idea of modernising/replacing the FHS, but just as many people were against doing so. Valid arguments were presented both ways, but in this article, I would like to focus on a common sentiment that came forward in that discussion: normal users shouldn't see the FHS, and advanced users are smart enough to figure out how the FHS works.
Permalink for comment 327766
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Basic edumacation.
by tupp on Sat 23rd Aug 2008 22:59 UTC in reply to "RE: Basic edumacation."
Member since:

Everyone should have a rudimentary knowledge of the directory tree and of the basic internal components of a computer.
I'm sure most here agree with that

I'm actually not to sure that most here agree with that assertion. In fact, the first question/point listed in the parent article is: "Normal users shouldn't see the FHS [directory structure]."

In addition, I agree that the Gobo/Beos/OSX-style directory configuration is better, and that the *nix directory configuration could probably be greatly simplified (especially for single user machines). However, I don't think that it would be a major effort for anyone to learn the basic differences between the directories that you mentioned. There are many simple charts that plainly show the particular properties of each basic directory.

Reply Parent Score: 2