Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 27th Aug 2008 17:09 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Permalink for comment 328191
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-12-21
In the recent past (about 5 years ago), a Dell+Sun merger (or whatever) made great sense. Sun was trying once again to get into the x86 business (without any good track record for low margin/high volume scenarios) and Dell didn't have anything (and arguably still doesn't) on the high end.
But since that time Dell has tried (and apparently is still actively trying) to commit suicide. Doesn't make the Dell+Sun deal that attractive anymore... (which probably means it will be attempted... company's timing usually stinks). Sun's delay on delivering the Rock processor (arguably because of IBM's P6 and now P7 announcements) didn't help Sun out any. Sun's secret was the fact that Niagra 2 can be used in a multi-socket scenario... but the news of that didn't really impress ANYONE. Schwartz seemed like a good choice for CEO at first, now, it's difficult to see where Sun is going... they seem to be happy treading water (but the water level keeps getting higher).
I would think (if it were true that Sun were setting itself up for sale... which I don't believe is necessarily true at this point) that HP and IBM would be the new suitors. It fits better probably with HP...
just don't how many "strange" architectures one company needs
Dell+Sun 5 years ago would have been the savior of both companies. And I'm not viewing this with 20/20 hindsight... you can search and find my proposals for this about 5 years ago or so (back in the McNealy days).