Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Sep 2008 16:46 UTC
"In 2005, AT&T CEO Ed Whitacre famously told BusinessWeek, "What they [Google, Vonage, and others] would like to do is to use my pipes free. But I ain't going to let them do that... Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?" The story of how the Internet is structured economically is not so much a story about net neutrality, but rather it's a story about how ISPs actually do use AT&T's pipes for free, and about why AT&T actually wants them to do so. These inter-ISP sharing arrangements are known as 'peering' or 'transit', and they are the two mechanisms that underlie the interconnection of networks that form the Internet. In this article, I'll to take a look at the economics of peering of transit in order to give you a better sense of how traffic flows from point A to point B on the Internet, and how it does so mostly without problems, despite the fact that the Internet is a patchwork quilt of networks run by companies, schools, and governments."
Permalink for comment 329041
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2007-09-06
As a customer (client side), I pay my ISP a regular rate for the privaledge of using there "pipes" (lets call them something crazy like wires). They then connect the port in my wall through there network and out to the greater internetworked world; along with inspecting my packets, arbitrarily blocking ports and yelling at me for running secured server deamons for personal access to my own data.
As a customer (server side), the nebulous "they" pay there ISP a regular rate for the privaledge of using there ISP's "pipes" (again, 'wires' if you will). The server's wall port is then connected through the ISP to the greater internetworked world.
I pay for my bandwidth and connection service. They pay for there bandwidth and connetino service.
So, what's the problem? Where does an ISP get off claiming that any server is using there networks for free? Is Google not paying to have fiber run to there server clusters?
Claiming that servers should now pay a premium on top of paying for there connections is just downright greedy. If TCP/IP where not so well designed and I could choose through which networks to route my frames, I'd say we all take our network traffic elsewhere and leave the Deathstar starved of cash and rotting in it's own greed.
But, that's just me.
(f'ing big business. Always looking for new and interesting ways to screw the customer out of more money for less services.)