Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Sep 2008 21:57 UTC, submitted by rkalla
Permalink for comment 329403
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I voted you up because I think you bring up a good point, but I disagree. It could cut either way. I agree with you that more defects in the code will be manifest by giving users more flexibility with how they use the program, but the argument could also be made that forcing the developers to accommodate a larger variety of usage scenarios would force the overall code quality to be higher to reach release quality.