Linked by David Adams on Wed 10th Sep 2008 15:43 UTC, submitted by Michael Larabel
Permalink for comment 330015
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
To me, I have to hear more to make a judgement. If someone says, "this is a great application from a local amateur developer" means to me that this guy is able to make a great piece of software regardless of the fact that he won't make any money off it. To me, an amateur who makes a high quality piece of software will receive more 'wow' from me than a paid developer who makes an application of similar quality. Maybe I'm just a romantic who cheers for the underdog.
I understand what you mean - some people make the leap to the conclusion that anything that isn't done by 'paid' experts is obviously of questionable quality (even if all evidence demonstrates to the contrary).