Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Sun 21st Sep 2008 06:46 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Permalink for comment 330980
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
The only thing the GPL makes you do is make your code available; that's it. The only reason it seems more complicated than that is because people keep trying to skirt around it in various creative ways which leads to all the licensing lawyer crap, but that's true of all software licensing no matter what the terms are.
How does freedom imply immunity from criticism? You can do whatever you wish, but that doesn't mean that I or whomever else won't try to persuade --and persuade is the operative word here-- you to do something else.
It's all the more silly to claim that your freedom is being encroached upon when in regards to a written article that you choose to read. Unless you actually have people in your yard with pitch forks --which would be a form of intimidation not mere persuasion--, I'm hard pressed to see how your hand is being forced.
If one's definition of freedom includes being free of social pressure of any kind, society probably isn't the place for you.