Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Sun 21st Sep 2008 06:46 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Linux Greg KH, Linux kernel developer delivered a keynote in the Linux plumbing conference about the health of the ecosystem. His message was essentially that distributions that don't contribute to the ecosystem have to rely on the whims of others which is unhealthy for them. Here is an introduction the development model and some interesting statistics about the Linux kernel code. Update by TH: Rebuttals are appearing all over the web, like this one by Canonical's Matt Zimmerman ("He's refuting a claim which has, quite simply, never been made. [...] When this sort of thing happens on mailing lists, it's called trolling."), or this one by another Canonical employee, Dustin Kirkland.
Permalink for comment 331033
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Keep your bugs
by sakeniwefu on Mon 22nd Sep 2008 04:31 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: This is why I wont use Ubuntu"
sakeniwefu
Member since:
2008-02-26

Bug reports are broken for Linux if we have to report to the appropriate package. What if, as is often the case, a program only fails when it is used with another program, window manager, hardware driver, etc?
For a project, tracking a few major distros bug tracking system for problems related to their own software isn't very hard. For users or the distros to specially report the bugs to individual projects, it is.

This rant is basically Enterprise Linux vs Desktop Linux. Red-Hat and friends contribute a lot of code, yes. What you all forget to mention is that it is code THEY and their corporate friends need. It adds 0 value to Linux as a Desktop OS. Ubuntu could run just as well on kFreeBSD(if the Debian port was still alive) or Minix. Shuttleworth chose Linux because hardware manufacturers are more likely to contribute drivers to it because of the license and the pressure from the Enterprise Linux world.

Edited 2008-09-22 04:33 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3