Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Sep 2008 07:50 UTC
Apple The situation regarding Apple's App Store for the iPhone is getting weirder by the day. Several applications have been rejected from the App Store based on seemingly dubious claims such as duplication of functionality (even though they didn't duplicate anything), or alikeness to default applications. Two such cases made headline news over the past few days; Podcaster and MailWrangler. The developers of these applications openly protested against these rejections, and apparently, Apple doesn't really like that. Apple now reiterates that rejections fall under the NDA, prohibiting developers from speaking up about rejections.
Permalink for comment 331294
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Valid contract in place?
by cjcoats on Wed 24th Sep 2008 16:36 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: First rule"
cjcoats
Member since:
2006-04-16

IANAL, but the first principle about contracts is that there must be an exchange. In the requests for Apple-store marketing of iPhone products, where is the exchange: what was given back to the developer in response to his request to have a product sold by the Apple store? Nothing! So there is no valid contract at all, hence Apple's NDA claim has no legal standing. Or so it looks to me... and that should be plain to anyone who has had the slightest exposure to either business-school or law.

Reply Parent Score: 3