Linked by David Adams on Wed 24th Sep 2008 22:44 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Permalink for comment 331418
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-16
This guy should be kicked.. if he's payed for the job that is. I'm participating in a small "niche" project (much smaller than anything on the OS field) so I know the position of the "forgotten underdog" quite well.
Linux is nice, and he has some points in regards to general users' views about Solaris (I also think it's pretty much irrelevant to me, and I don't really care about ZFS or DTrace even if I'm a dev, but then I'm not an OS dev).
However the whole message is a FUD. Saying that "project X is dead or irrelevant" in OSS is just FUD. No project is dead or irrelevant in OSS, not even projects which are "formally" dead. Why's that? Simple:
1. The source is there so someone can pick up
2. They probably do things in different way at some point which can be quite important for general progress
So, FUD alarm from me, we should probably hatemail this guy. I'm a Linux user btw, but this is "teh sh!t".