Linked by David Adams on Tue 30th Sep 2008 02:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 331999
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
The problem with policies is that it is not law or a legally binding contract.
So though you could mention that in your policy statement, it does not stop the disagreeing party to reject future changes in policy.
Also though you may see statements that effectively state in your employment contract that require you to accept to their policies even if it changes, it doesn't stand a chance in court. This however does not mean lawyers wouldn't come up with ingenious ways of hoodwinking the unsuspecting public.