Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 1st Oct 2008 22:28 UTC
Permalink for comment 332360
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
I agree. So many people have been clamouring for CMYK, and I suspect most don't even know why they'd need it, except that "it's necessary for professionals".
Colour separation is a lossy conversion, you want it to be done whenever you need CMYK - meaning when you're actually going to print it. Better leave it to the printers.
Embedded profiles, sRGB, etc coupled with high bit depths (if your capturing device supports it) is more important. Another feature the graphic people I work with value greatly is adjustment layers.
From what I understand, all of these are coming or already there in the GIMP.