Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Oct 2008 10:37 UTC, submitted by John Mills
Permalink for comment 332731
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-09-14
Two things... 1) Mono IS NOT PART OF GNOME... Gnome has Mono bindings available and there are several non-essential applications that take advantage of this fact. There is NOTHING saying that you must have these applications available to use Gnome. 2) Mono implements all of the bits of .Net and C# that are specified by open standards, but does also implement extra pieces outside of the standard that increase compatibility with applications written for the Windows platform. These non-standard pieces are NOT required to use Mono or the C# language. Just because some pieces of the software that are questionably legal does not mean that you have to throw the whole thing out. There have also been several comments mentioning the uselessness of ASP.NET capabilities. This is absurd. Like it or not, there are _many_ ASP.NET applications out there and any opportunities to move these applications to platforms other than Windows should be welcomed.