Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Oct 2008 10:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 332986
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-09
I'm a strong advocate and user of Arch Linux and FreeBSD, both of which perform faster and are more stable and secure than their Microsoft competitor.
From my desktop user experience, FreeBSD is the fastest performer out there, however, Linux offers more familiar bells and whistles like Flash and Virtualization as host.
The primary culprit preventing both Linux and FreeBSD from eclipsing Microsoft is simply the availability of the most popular software and games that are already readily available for Microsoft. When most people turn on their PC these days, they really would like to see:
Photoshop
Xara Xtreme Pro
AutoCAD
Mathlab
Nero
Corel
Alcohol 120%
Daemon Tools
plus many more apps
and games - games - games...
"Wine" doesn't really cut it. We at the Linux and FreeBSD communities would like to see native running applications and games (or very good open source clones), plain and simple. Give us some of those apps and games, and you will see both Linux and FreeBSD take off.
Edited 2008-10-09 08:06 UTC