Linked by Adam S on Tue 14th Oct 2008 12:30 UTC
Windows According to the official Windows Vista Blog, Microsoft has decided that, in order to keep things simple, the OS code-named "Windows 7" will officially be called "Windows 7." Sayeth the poster: "since we began development of the next version of the Windows client operating system we have been referring to it by a codename, "Windows 7." But now is a good time to announce that we've decided to officially call the next version of Windows, "Windows 7."" Of course, this introduces a major issue - if the version number of Windows 7 is, in fact, 6.1 or 6.2, as many expect, how can you call it Windows 7? And if the kernel version is updated to version 7, how many apps and drivers might fail due to poor version checking? I'm sure the upcoming PDC and WinHEC events will shed some light on this.
Permalink for comment 333686
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Drivers
by sbergman27 on Tue 14th Oct 2008 19:38 UTC in reply to "RE: Drivers"
Member since:

Ok, in 5 years, around 2013 I'll call your bet.
Upps, you lose!

Not unless things change very radically in that time.

Linux does a truly horrible job of dealing with drivers for new hardware. And I'm not talking about drivers for new hardware not existing, or vendors not providing the specs, or anything like that. That is a separate discussion.

I'm talking about the fact that the prescribed course for any user with a piece of new hardware is to upgrade to the latest version of their distro. And if the latest stable version does not support the hardware, then using the latest beta, or even alpha version of the distro may be required. I had to move to an early alpha version of my distro of choice just to get SATA working on my Intel G43 chipset motherboard. That is a totally brain-dead driver management policy. The truly horrifying thing is that some within the community apparently think that policy is fine and dandy.

Edited 2008-10-14 19:43 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4