
According to the official Windows Vista Blog, Microsoft has decided that, in order to keep things simple,
the OS code-named "Windows 7" will officially be called "Windows 7." Sayeth the poster: "
since we began development of the next version of the Windows client operating system we have been referring to it by a codename, "Windows 7." But now is a good time to announce that we've decided to officially call the next version of Windows, "Windows 7."" Of course, this introduces a major issue - if the version number of Windows 7 is, in fact, 6.1 or 6.2, as many expect, how can you call it Windows 7? And if the kernel version is updated to version 7, how many apps and drivers might fail due to poor version checking? I'm sure the upcoming PDC and WinHEC events will shed some light on this.
Member since:
2005-08-07
lemur2 asked...
With Linux ... why not be up-to-date?
Because sometimes stability matters?
Please note, the OP in the conversation chain is talking about having to install bleeding edge beta or even alpha quality software simply in order to have full hardware support for his hardware.
Of course, using your examples above with Win9x and Vista, the advantage of Linux is you can compile a kernel to get your hardware to work. Try doing that with a proprietary OS...
--bornagainpenguin
Edited 2008-10-15 03:31 UTC