Linked by Adam S on Wed 15th Oct 2008 12:02 UTC
Permalink for comment 333894
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
What a ridiculous statement.
Since when does features (of which the scope you have absolutely no idea) have any bearing on the name of a release?
Windows 7 is indeed Windows Vista + 1, that's undeniable in that it is the direct successor to it.
Windows 6.1 is being used for compatibility reasons (much like how Windows XP was 5.1).
Does that mean that XP was not a monumental step up from the non-NT predecessors? No. It just means that they decided to preserve a major revision number.
It's amazing there are so many articles over something so trivial. Accept it and move on.