Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Oct 2008 22:08 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Permalink for comment 334045
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-12-31
> Of course, you have to have two kernels that understand the same
> serialization structures. So it would have to be versioned and you would
> have to have some way to fall back to the old kernel in case the new
> one had a problem in the deserialization.
I think that kinda defeats the purpose. Exchanging kernels is a risky task anyway, and introducing yet another potential source of problems (like the de-/serialization you mentioned) doesn't seem very wise to me. Especially if your goal is either kernel development or a high-availability system.