
Here at OSNews, we use a moderation system where your peers rate your comments, and where the OSNews staff rarely intervene. This system was put in place after realising that the editorial moderation was failing miserably; it had become too much work. Sifting through ten reported comments a day is one thing, sifting through 100 of them each day is another. The result was that editorial moderation had become willy-nilly, which led to understandable user frustration, and pointless email rants back and forth between users and staff members (mea culpa). The answer to this problem turned out to be a two-step process: banning anonymous commenting, and our peer moderation system. While the moderation system has its flaws, it has exceeded all of our expectations in making sure that our comments' sections are free of spam, and relatively fun to read. Still, we realise problems exist, but we also see a lot of misinformation floating around. The treat we have in store for you today will help in fixing some of that.
Member since:
2005-07-12
LOL yea although sometimes I do get abit worried about Linux unix posts I make due to the abuse of the system by some members of the community. But usable someone will come along and bump your post back up so it can be viewed.
Rants are quite common here but I hope to see a good level of even keal by the community when it comes to modding posts by the community.
Also most comments on page 12 don't have a chance of being upped no matter how good they are unless a admin bumps it which is good.
Nice to see some stats regarding whats happening I hope it becomes a regular feature (once a year) or as a link somewhere on the site.