Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Oct 2008 22:34 UTC
The legal battle between Macintosh clone maker PsyStar and Apple is still being waged, but it appears that the two companies are going to do what some of us had already predicted: settle the whole thing out of court.
Permalink for comment 334503
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A company sells a hardware (like psystar/dell/any).
They offer a patch which users can use to patch OS X to run on that pc. When the updates are available they give out another set of patches that can be used on the update to patch it and then they can update the OS.
Yes I have been there seen doing that. (PPF patches type of patch.).
The user buys OS X retail and does what he wants. Will that be wrong.
I mean the vista inspirat theme does it, Vista Transformation Pack changes windows. Then why not the mac patcher!.
Would it violate a EULA that can be tested in COURT???
Hmm Interesting .. What does anyone want to say?
Member since:
2007-03-22
A company sells a hardware (like psystar/dell/any).
They offer a patch which users can use to patch OS X to run on that pc. When the updates are available they give out another set of patches that can be used on the update to patch it and then they can update the OS.
Yes I have been there seen doing that. (PPF patches type of patch.).
The user buys OS X retail and does what he wants. Will that be wrong.
I mean the vista inspirat theme does it, Vista Transformation Pack changes windows. Then why not the mac patcher!.
Would it violate a EULA that can be tested in COURT???
Hmm Interesting .. What does anyone want to say?